All case studies

Insurance · Life and health insurance

AI platform for claims assessment in insurance

Starting point

An insurer processes thousands of benefit claims annually. Each claim file contains medical findings, assessments, and physician statements — typically running to double-digit page counts per case. All analysis was performed manually. The existing line-of-business system had been in production for years but was never designed for AI-assisted analysis. The challenge: integrating AI capabilities into a mature system without disrupting live operations — with an architecture that holds up under DORA and the EU AI Act.

What we did

We built an AI platform for claims assessment and developed two integration scenarios — from pragmatic entry point to full system integration — through to a board-level decision document. The platform processes medical documents, automatically classifies over one hundred document types, and extracts structured domain data. In parallel: compliance analysis across five regulatory frameworks, data protection assessment, and responsibility delineation between all parties involved. The decision document was prepared for a board-level committee. Team: 3 people over 12 weeks. Disciplines: product architecture, system integration, regulatory analysis.

Results

12 weeks

from first workshop to approved decision document

> 100

document types in automatic classification

2

integration scenarios with full evaluation

5

regulatory frameworks in the compliance analysis

What we learned

The real challenge with AI in claims processing is not model quality — it is integration with existing systems. The best extraction results are worthless if the examiner cannot see and correct them in their familiar working environment. Human-in-the-loop is not a feature. It is an architectural decision.

This is the summary. How we approached it methodologically — which architectural decisions we made, what we discarded and which patterns can be transferred to other contexts — we discuss in a personal conversation.

Not because we want to sell you something. But because this depth is what our clients engage us for — and it does not belong on the open internet.